Marcadores electrocardiográficos de estimulación septal del tracto de salida del ventrículo derecho

Marleny Cruz Cardntey, Zana Cort, Ana Mengana Betancourt, Yiliam Blanco Pérez, Zoinez Soto García, Alain Gutierrez Lopez

Texto completo:

PDF

Resumen

Introducción: Los patrones electrocardiográficos de verdadera estimulación septal del tracto de salida del ventrículo derecho no están claramente identificados.

Objetivo: Identificar los marcadores electrocardiográficos de estimulación septal del tracto de salida del ventrículo derecho.

Métodos: Se realiza un estudio observacional en 30 pacientes con implante del electrodo ventricular permanente en el tracto de salida del ventrículo derecho. Para el electrocardiograma de 12 derivaciones se programó la estimulación en modo VVI a 100 latidos por minuto. La posición del electrodo se validó con la ecocardiografía transtorácica bidimensional.

Resultados: Los verdaderos implantes septales fueron 21/30 (80 %). La media de la duración del QRS fue menor en el grupo septal (126,2 ± 9,7 ms vs. 144,4 ± 15,1 ms; p = 0,003) y la melladura del QRS en DII, DIII, aVL y aVF se relacionó con la ubicación no septal: p = 0,005, p = 0,019, p = 0,049 y p = 0,005, respectivamente. El QRS neto en DII (14,3 ± 6,0 mm vs. 9,3 ± 3,0 mm; p = 0,045), DIII (12,6 ± 5,8 mm vs. 8,0 ± 4,7 mm; p = 0,036) y aVF (14,0 ± 6,4 mm vs. 8,8 ± 4,3 mm; p = 0,025) fue mayor en el grupo septal. La duración del QRS estimulado ≤ 135 ms mostró sensibilidad en el 81,0 % y especificidad en el 66,7 % y la ausencia de melladura en las derivaciones inferiores, sensibilidad 95,2 % y especificidad 44,4 % para identificar estimulación septal.

Conclusiones: Los marcadores electrocardiográficos de estimulación septal del tracto de salida de ventrículo derecho son heterogéneos; los indicadores de validez, de la duración del QRS y la ausencia de melladura en derivaciones inferiores son adecuados para identificar este sitio de estimulación.

Palabras clave

estimulación cardíaca artificial; tabique interventricular; electrocardiograma.

Referencias

Laksono S, Setianto B, Iqbal M, Prawara AS. Understanding Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy Incidence and Predictors in Patients with Right Ventricular Pacing: A Systematic Review. Int J Angiol. 2021;31(1):10-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735206 .

Mizner J, Jurak P, Linkova H, Smisek R, Curila K. Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Pacemakers, the Utility of Ultra-high-frequency ECG and Other Dyssynchrony Assessment Tools. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.01

Dawood M, Elsharkawy E, Abdel-Hay MA, Nawar M. Predictors of pacing induced left ventricular dysfunction and cardiomyopathy assessed by three-dimensional echocardiography and speckle tracking strain. Egypt Heart J. 2021;73(1):10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-021-00136-x

Cruz M, Cort Z, Gutiérrez A, Mengana A, Ramos MY. Estimulación septal del ventrículo derecho como alternativa a la estimulación apical. ¿Cómo ubicar el electrodo? Rev Cuban Cardiol Cir Cardiovasv. 2020 [acceso 03/10/2021];26(3):1561-2937. Disponible en: http://www.revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/914

Bansal R, Parakh N, Gupta A, Juneja R, Naik N, Yadav R, et al. Incidence and predictors of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy with comparison between apical and non-apical right ventricular pacing sites. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;56(1):63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00602-2

Squara F, Scarlatti D, Riccini P, Garret G, Moceri P, Ferrari E. Classical fluoroscopy criteria poorly predict right ventricular lead septal positioning by comparison with echocardiography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;52(2):209-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0355-x

Kaye GC, Rowe MK, Gould PA. Using the Surface ECG to Identify Right Ventricular Pacing Lead Position: A Cautionary Tale. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(9):1039-41. DOI: https://doi.org10.1111/pace.13065

Burri H, Park CI, Zimmermann M, Gentil-Baron P, Stettler C, Sunthorn H, et al. Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping. Europace. 2011;13(1):82-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq332

Rowe MK, Moore P, Pratap J, Coucher J, Gould PA, Kaye GC. Surface ECG and Fluoroscopy are Not Predictive of Right Ventricular Septal Lead Position Compared to Cardiac CT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(5):537-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13066

Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):e51-e156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 .

Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, et al. Corrigendum to: 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace 2022;24(4):699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac023

Mǎrgulescu AD, Suran BM, Rimbaş RC, Dulgheru RE, Silişte C, Vinereanu D. Accuracy of fluoroscopic and electrocardiographic criteria for pacemaker lead implantation by comparison with three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(7):796-803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.04.010 .

Das A, Kahali D. Ventricular septal pacing: Optimum method to position the lead. Indian Heart J 2018;70(5):713-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.023

Shenthar J, Rai MK, Chakali SS, Pillai V, Delhaas T. Computed tomography validated right ventricular mid-septal lead implantation using right ventricular angiography. J Arrhythm. 2021;37(5):1131-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12591

Squara F, Scarlatti D, Riccini P, Garret G, Moceri P, Ferrari E. Individualized Left Anterior Oblique Projection: A Highly Reliable Patient-Tailored Fluoroscopy Criterion for Right Ventricular Lead Positioning. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(7):e006107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006107

Wei H, Tang J, Chen D, Zhang Q, Liang Y, Liu L, et al. Electrocardiographic predictors of validated right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing for correct localization of transthoracic echocardiography. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(3):354-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22873

Israel CW, Tribunyan S, Yen Ho S, Cabrera JA. Anatomy for right ventricular lead implantation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022;33(3):319-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-022-00872-w

Enriquez A, Baranchuk A, Briceno D, Saenz L, García F. How to use the 12-lead ECG to predict the site of origin of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(10):1538-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.002

Hahn RT, Waxman AB, Denti P, Delhaas T. Anatomic relationship of the complex tricuspid valve, right ventricle, and pulmonary vasculature: A review. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(5):478-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0535

Mala A, Osmancik P, Herman D, Curila K, Stros P, Vesela J, et al. Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020;22(F):14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094

Dixit S, Gerstenfeld EP, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Electrocardiographic patterns of superior right ventricular outflow tract tachycardias: distinguishing septal and free-wall sites of origin. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02404.x

McGavigan AD, Roberts-Thomson KC, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: radiographic and electrocardiographic correlates of lead position. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(10):1063-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00499.x

Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG. The right ventricular outflow tract: a comparative study of septal, anterior wall, and free wall pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30(8):942-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00790.x

Shimeno K, Yoshiyama T, Abe Y, Akamatsu K, Kagawa S, Matsumoto R, et al. The usefulness of right ventriculography to aid anchoring a pacing lead to the right ventricular septum. Europace. 2018;20:1154‐60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux165

Pang BJ, Joshi SB, Lui EH, Tacey MA, Ling LH, Alison J, et al. Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(4):495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12301

Gupta A, Parakh N, Bansal R, Verma SK, Roy A, Sharma G, et al. Correlation of pacing site in right ventricle with paced QRS complex duration. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018;18(6):210-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2018.08.001

Matsuo M, Shimeno K, Yoshiyama T, Matsumura Y, Matsumoto R, Abe Y, et al. Utility of the combination of simple electrocardiographic parameters for identifying mid-septal pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(11):2433-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14174

Pastore G, Zanon F, Baracca E, Rigatelli G, Corbucci G, Mazza A, et al. How can we identify the optimal pacing site in the right ventricular septum? A simplified method applicable during the standard implanting procedure. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;3(4):264-72.

Kamakura S, Shimizu W, Matsuo K, Taguchi A, Suyama K, Kurita T, et al. Localization of optimal ablation site of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia from right and left ventricular outflow tract by body surface ECG. Circulation. 1998;98(15):1525-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1525

Osmancik P, Stros P, Herman D, Curila K, Petr R. The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):719-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000232

Chen D, Wei H, Tang J, Liu L, Wu S, Lin C, et al. A randomized comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for implanting pacemaker lead on the right ventricular outflow tract septum. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32(5):721-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0840-1

Balt JC, van Hemel NM, Wellens HJ, de Voogt WG. Radiological and electrocardiographic characterization of right ventricular outflow tract pacing. Europace. 2010;12(12):1739-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq341

Shima T, Ohnishi Y, Inoue T, Yoshida A, Shimizu H, Itagaki T, et al. The relation between the pacing sites in the right ventricular outflow tract and QRS morphology in the 12-lead ECG. Jpn Circ J. 1998;62(6):399-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.62.399

Andrikopoulos G, Tzeis S, Asbach S, Semmler V, Lennerz C, Solzbach U, et al. SPICE Study Investigators. A stepwise electrocardiographic algorithm for differentiation of mid-septal vs. apical right ventricular lead positioning: the SPICE ECG substudy. Europace. 2015;17(6):915-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu344

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.




Copyright (c) 2022 Marleny Cruz Cardntey, Zana Cort, Alain Gutierrez Lopez, Ana Mengana Betancourt, Yiliam Blanco Pérez, Zoinez Soto García

Licencia de Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.