Effectiveness of Radial and Femoral Access Routes in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Authors

Keywords:

percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary artery disease; femoral arterial access; radial arterial access

Abstract

Introduction: Radial access is the technique of choice for coronary intervention; however, in our setting, its adoption has been slow and heterogeneous, conditioned by greater historical experience with the femoral route, the longer learning curve of the radial route, and logistical limitations. The comparative effectiveness and safety of both approaches is unknown in our institution, which justifies the present study.

Objective: To evaluate angiographic success according to the access route, radial or femoral, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods: Observational, analytical, cohort study conducted at the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery between January 2023 and December 2024. The study population included 242 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial or femoral access.

Results: Males predominated, and the mean age was 62.8 ± 10.4 years. The proportion of angiographic success was similar between patients treated via the radial route and those treated via the femoral route (113/120; 94.2% vs. 120/122; 98.4%; p = 0.201). Femoral access resulted in longer hospital stays (4.5 [2.0-7.0] vs. 2.0 [1.5-3.5] days; p = 0.011), a higher incidence of significant bleeding (18.3% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.015), and higher in-hospital mortality (6.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.03) compared with radial access.

Conclusions: Radial access is as effective as femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention and has a more favorable safety profile, with less bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and hospital stay.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. González Veliz A, López Ferrero LH, Rodríguez Nande LM, Alfonso Rodríguez E, Ramos Busutil S, Llerena Rojas LD. Seguimiento a dos años de pacientes con oclusiones totales crónicas de arterias coronarias. Rev Cub Invest Biomed. 2024 [acceso 20/02/2024];43. Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/2715

2. Ahmad Bhat F, Hamid Changal K, Raina H, Ahmad Tramboo N, Ahmad Rather H. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty –A prospective, randomized comparison. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2017 [acceso 20/02/2024];17:23. Disponible en: https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-016-0457-2

3. Baim DS, Grossman W. Percutaneous Approach, including transeptal cathterization an apical left ventricle puncture. In: Grossman W, Baim DS, eds. Cardiac catheterization, angiography and intervention. Malvern (Pennsylvania. USA): Lea and Febiger. 1991 [acceso 20/02/2024]:62-81. Disponible en: https://cardiology.lwwhealthlibrary.com/book.aspx?bookid=3085

4. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography: a percutaneuos transfemoral technique. Radiology. 1967 [acceso 20/02/2024];89(5):815-24. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6048074/

5. Reich R, Helal L, Mantovani VM, Rabelo-Silva ER. Hemostasis after percutaneous transfemoral access: a protocol for systematic review. Medicine. 2020 [acceso 20/02/2024];99(52). Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2020/12240/hemostasis_after_percutaneous_transfemoral_access_.37.aspx

6. Kiameneij F, Laarman GJ, De Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995 [acceso 20/02/2024];129:1-7. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0002870395900349

7. Azcurra P, Beati S, Arias Cardona L, De Mattos K, Ariel Carrizo M, Rodríguez Vallejo F, et al. Accesos vasculares percutáneos en hemodinamia. En: Margarita García Álvarez. Manual de procedimientos Hemodinamia y Cardiología intervencionista. 2da_ed. SOLACI;2021 [acceso 20/02/2024]; p.436. Disponible en: https://enfermeriaencardiologia.com/images/gthemodinamica/recursos/Manual-de-Proc-Hemodinamia2021-act.pdf

8. Valgimigli M, Calabro P, Cortese B, Frigoli E, Garducci S, Rubartelli P, et al. Scienific foundation and possible implications for practice of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by transradial access site and systemic implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) trial, J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 [acceso 20/02/2024];7(1):101-11. Disponible en: https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/clinicaltrials/2015/03/15/16/58/matrix-radial-vs-femoral

9. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60404-2.

10. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates BE, Beckie TM, Bischoff JE, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. JACC. 2021;79,(2):1-126. DOI: https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006

11. Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel ML, Rab T, Tamis-Holland JE, Alexander JH, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. JACC. 2025;85(22):2135-206. DOI: https://www.jacc.org/doi/epdf/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.009

12. Alfonso Rodríguez E, Llerena Rojas LD, Rodríguez Nande LM, Echarte Martínez JC, López Ferrero LH, González Veliz A. Experiencia inicial de la revascularización coronaria percutánea mediante el acceso transradial en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. Rev Cub Invest Biomed. 2022 [acceso 10/05/2025];41. Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/2226/1122

13. Liévano MJ, Villegas JE, Sánchez Cantillo JJ, Acosta G. Abordaje radial distal izquierdo a través de la tabaquera anatómica para la realización de angiografía coronaria. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2020 [acceso 10/05/2025];27(5):414-9. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-56332020000500414

14. Almeida Gómez J, Leyva Quert AY, Moronta Soriano EA, Brooks Tamayo J, Méndez Peralta TC, Valdés Recarey M. Efectividad de la vía de acceso transradial en el intervencionismo coronario percutáneo. Rev Cub Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2011 [acceso 10/05/2025];17(2):143-49. Disponible en: https://revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/53

15. Alfonso Rodríguez E, Llerena Rojas L, López Ferrero L, Zabala García A, López Cabrera G. Initial experience of cardiac catheterization through distal radial access in a femoralist center. Rev Cub Invest Biomed. 2020 [acceso 10/05/2025];39(2). Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/e441/pdf

16. Asociación Médica Mundial. Finlandia: AMM; 2024 [acceso 10/05/2025]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/policiespost/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-paralas-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/

17. Bastante T, Arzamendi D, Martín-Moreiras J, Cid Álvarez AB. Registro español de hemodinámica y cardiología intervencionista. XXXIII informe oficial de la Asociación de Cardiología Intervencionista de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1990-2023). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2024 [acceso 10/05/2025]:1-11. Disponible en: https://www.revespcardiol.org/es-registro-espanol-hemodinamica-cardiologia-intervencionista--articulo-S0300893224002781

18. Crea F. Dyslipidaemias in stroke, chronic kidney disease, and aortic stenosis: the new frontiers for cholesterol lowering. Eur Heart J. 2021 [acceso 10/05/2025];42(22):2137-40. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/22/2137/6294591

19. Mc Sweeney JC, Rosenfeld AG, Abel WM. Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(13):1302-31. DOI: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000381

20. Guan C, Yang W, Song L, Chen J, Qian J, Wu F, et al. Association of Acute Procedural Results with Long-term Outcomes After CTO-PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2021 [acceso 10/05/2025];14(3):289-91. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1936879820320240

21. González-Veliz A, López-Ferrero LH, Rodríguez-Nande LM, Llerena-Rojas LD, Alfonso-Rodríguez E, Martínez-Benítez P. Intervencionismo coronario percutáneo en oclusiones totales crónicas. Rev Cuban Cardiol Cirug. 2019 [acceso 10/05/2025];25(2). Disponible en: http://www.revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/815

22. Ramírez Hernández EJ, López Ferrero LH, Aroche Aportela R, Rodríguez Nande LM, Calderín Pino R, González Veliz A. Intervención coronaria percutánea en adultos jóvenes con síndrome coronario agudo. Rev Cuban Cardiol Cirug. 2025 [acceso 10/05/2025];31. Disponible en: https://revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/3079/1909

23. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, Heg D, Raber L, Feres F, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet. 2017 [acceso 10/05/2025];389:1025-34. Disponible en: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)30397-5/abstract

24. Gao C, Buszman P, Buszman B, van Geuns RJ, Serruys PW, Zurakowski A, et al. Influence of Bleeding Risk on Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial. CJC. 2021 [acceso 10/05/2025];37(1):122-30. Disponible en: https://onlinecjc.ca/article/S0828-282X(20)30178-1/fulltext#app-1

25. Kei- Yan A, Yeung Ng P, Ip A, Man- Hong J, Chung- Wah S. Association Between Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Mortality. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 [acceso 10/05/2025];10(15). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475672/

26. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;145(3):1-109. DOI: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038

27. Mustafa Üreyen Ç, Coşansu K, Gökhan Vura M, Emir Şahin S, Kocayiğit I, Türker Pabuccu M, et al. Is trans-radial approach related to an increased risk of radiation exposure in patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention? (The SAKARYA study). Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 [acceso 10/05/2025];22(1):5-12. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683214/

28. Ahmet Huyut M, Hatice Yamaç A. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 May [acceso 10/05/2025];19(5):319-25. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29724974/

29. Basu D, Mohinder Singh P, Tiwari A, Goudra B. Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures. Indian Heart Journal. 2017 [acceso 10/05/2025];69(5):580-8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216303194

30. Li H, Rha SW, Geol Choi B, Suk Shim M, Yeon Choi S, Ung Choi C, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in Korean population. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33:716-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.316

31. Aziz Alkatiri A, Firman D, Haryono N, Yonas E, Pranata R, Fahri I, et al. Comparison between radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention access in Indonesian hospitals, 2017-2018: A prospective observational study of a national registry. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Mar;27. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056720/

32. Le May M, Wells G, So D, Yeong Chong A, Dick A, Froeschl M, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMACardiol. 2020 [acceso 10/05/2025];5(2):126-34. Disponible en: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abstract/2758278

33. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Vranckx P, Rothenbühler M, Tebaldi M, et al. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10150):835-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8

34. Tso MK, Rajah G, Dossani R, Meyer MJ, McPheeters M, Vakharia K, et al. Learning curves for transradial access versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 [acceso 10/05/2025];14(2):174-8. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34078647

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

1.
González Veliz A, Abreu Pérez Y, Torres Reyes LB, Rodríguez Nande LM, Llerena Rojas LD, Ramos Busutil S. Effectiveness of Radial and Femoral Access Routes in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Rev. cuba. cardiol. cir. cardiovasc. [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 23 [cited 2026 Aug. 10];32. Available from: https://revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/3363

Issue

Section

Original Articles